Showing posts with label emergency management. Show all posts
Showing posts with label emergency management. Show all posts

Thursday, April 24, 2025

Apps for Emergency Preparedness and Response


By John Fisher (assisted by AI)

Introduction

Emergency preparedness and response applications are crucial digital tools designed to assist individuals, communities, and organizations before, during, and after emergencies. By enhancing situational awareness, streamlining communication, and providing access to critical information, these apps help a diverse group of users - from everyday citizens to first responders and healthcare professionals - manage crises more effectively. As technology continues to evolve, the integration of mobile apps into emergency management strategies has become a critical component of resilience and recovery efforts (Rodríguez, Donner, & Trainor, 2018).

Applications for Different Users

General Public: Individuals and families seeking to stay informed and prepared can use apps like the FEMA App, which provides weather alerts, safety tips, and emergency kit tools (FEMA, n.d.). Similarly, the American Red Cross appsoffer real-time alerts and preparedness information for specific emergencies, while the Ready.gov App helps users create emergency plans and build kits (American Red Cross, n.d.; Ready.gov, n.d.). The Disaster Alert app enhances global hazard monitoring, giving everyday users immediate access to threat information (Pacific Disaster Center, n.d.).

First Responders: Firefighters, police officers, and paramedics depend on specialized applications such as the NIMS ICS Guide to support Incident Command operations (Informed Publishing, n.d.). iAlertz provides real-time notifications for users in New York, and ERG2020 delivers critical hazardous material information for responders in transit (U.S. Department of Transportation, 2020).

Emergency Managers: Professionals at all levels of government utilize applications like the NIMS ICS Guide for operational structure and coordination. Tools such as Disaster Alert also help emergency managers monitor threats globally and disseminate alerts efficiently (Pacific Disaster Center, n.d.).

Healthcare Professionals: For doctors, nurses, and hospital staff, the Pocket First Aid & CPR app provides essential medical guidelines, while HealthMap: Outbreaks Near Me tracks local disease outbreaks, allowing quick preventative action (American Heart Association, n.d.; HealthMap, n.d.). The PFA Mobile app supports field interventions with Psychological First Aid tools, helping healthcare providers address trauma effectively (National Center for PTSD, n.d.).

Volunteers: Volunteer groups use tools like the American Red Cross apps to coordinate tasks and receive real-time updates during emergencies. Apps like PFA Mobile offer mental health support resources crucial for volunteers working in high-stress environments (National Center for PTSD, n.d.).

Organizations and Businesses: Companies focused on business continuity benefit from apps like the FEMA App and Ready.gov App to develop emergency plans and communicate with employees. Asset tracking and operational continuity are facilitated through emergency management-focused applications such as iAlertz.

Conclusion

Emergency preparedness and response applications have become indispensable tools for a wide range of users, from individual citizens to professional responders and healthcare providers. These apps ensure that critical information, resources, and communication channels are readily available, significantly improving preparedness and response efforts. As emergencies become more complex and technology advances, the role of mobile applications in saving lives and protecting communities will only continue to grow. Investing in the continued development and promotion of these tools is a key strategy for building resilient communities (Bumgarner, 2008; Van de Walle, Turoff, & Hiltz, 2010).

Keywords: emergency preparedness, mobile applications, disaster response, emergency management, situational awareness

Hashtags: #EmergencyPreparedness #DisasterResponse #MobileApps #CrisisManagement #ResilientCommunities

References

American Heart Association. (n.d.). Pocket First Aid & CPR. Retrieved from https://www.heart.org

American Red Cross. (n.d.). Mobile Apps. Retrieved from https://www.redcross.org/get-help/how-to-prepare-for-emergencies/mobile-apps.html

Bumgarner, J. B. (2008). Emergency Management: A Reference Handbook. ABC-CLIO.

FEMA. (n.d.). FEMA App. Retrieved from https://www.fema.gov/mobile-app

HealthMap. (n.d.). Outbreaks Near Me. Retrieved from https://healthmap.org/outbreaksnearme

Informed Publishing. (n.d.). NIMS ICS Guide. Retrieved from https://informedguides.com/nims-ics-guide

National Center for PTSD. (n.d.). PFA Mobile. Retrieved from https://www.ptsd.va.gov/appvid/mobile/pfa_app.asp

NIOSH. (n.d.). NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npg/

Pacific Disaster Center. (n.d.). Disaster Alert. Retrieved from https://www.pdc.org/disaster-alert-app/

Ready.gov. (n.d.). Make a Plan. Retrieved from https://www.ready.gov/plan

Rodríguez, H., Donner, W., & Trainor, J. E. (Eds.). (2018). Handbook of Disaster Research. Springer.

SAMHSA. (n.d.). Behavioral Health Disaster Response App. Retrieved from https://www.samhsa.gov/dtac/dbhis-collections/behavioral-health-disaster-response-app

U.S. Department of Transportation. (2020). ERG2020 - Emergency Response Guidebook. Retrieved from https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/hazmat/erg/emergency-response-guidebook-erg

Van de Walle, B. A., Turoff, M., & Hiltz, S. R. (Eds.). (2010). Information Systems for Emergency Management. M.E. Sharpe.

Friday, December 06, 2024

Leadership in the Emergency Services

The Importance of Management Principles in Emergency and Non-Emergency Contexts

Introduction
Management principles such as Span of Control, Unity of Command, and Management by Objectives (MBO) are essential for effective coordination and decision-making in both emergency and non-emergency situations. These principles provide structure, enhance communication, and promote adaptability—traits that are indispensable in complex scenarios. This article explores these key management principles as discussed in ESMG 3150 Principles of Management in Emergency Management, illustrating their applications with real-world examples and insights from practitioners.


Span of Control: Balancing Leadership and Oversight

Span of Control refers to the number of individuals or teams a supervisor can effectively oversee. This principle ensures that managers or commanders are neither overwhelmed nor underutilized, enabling them to maintain clear communication and efficient decision-making.

In non-emergency settings, Span of Control is commonly applied in corporate environments where managers with too many direct reports risk inefficiencies and reduced team productivity. For example, a manager overseeing a sales team of 15 might struggle to provide personalized feedback or track individual progress effectively. By limiting direct reports to an optimal number—typically 3-7—managers can build stronger relationships and achieve better outcomes (Hodge et al., 2020).

In emergency settings, such as a wildfire response, Span of Control is critical. Incident commanders must delegate responsibilities to division supervisors to maintain operational clarity. Without proper adherence to this principle, incidents can quickly devolve into chaos, as seen in disaster responses where miscommunication led to delayed evacuations or resource mismanagement (FEMA, 2023).


Unity of Command: Ensuring Clarity in Leadership

Unity of Command mandates that each individual reports to only one supervisor, reducing confusion and streamlining decision-making.

In non-emergency scenarios, this principle is applied to corporate, educational, and governmental structures. Employees who understand their reporting lines are less likely to receive conflicting instructions, fostering efficiency and accountability. For example, in a university setting, professors reporting to a single department head experience clearer expectations and consistent feedback, contributing to better performance.

During emergencies, such as multi-agency disaster responses, Unity of Command is indispensable. The Incident Command System (ICS) exemplifies this principle, assigning responders to clear supervisors within a unified structure. A cardiac arrest scene demonstrates its effectiveness; with one designated leader assigning roles like chest compressions or airway management, teams can follow Advanced Cardiac Life Support protocols with precision, improving patient outcomes (American Heart Association, 2022).


Management by Objectives: Aligning Tasks with Goals

Management by Objectives (MBO) involves setting clear, measurable goals aligned with an organization’s mission. This principle fosters accountability and adaptability, making it effective across various settings.

In non-emergency situations, businesses use MBO to align departmental objectives with organizational goals. For example, a retail company may establish sales targets for each quarter, allowing managers to track progress and adjust strategies as needed (Drucker, 1954). Regular feedback loops enhance accountability and enable continuous improvement.

In emergency contexts, MBO ensures responders understand the task, purpose, and end state of their mission. For instance, during hurricane evacuations, MBO ensures that responders prioritize safety, establish clear evacuation timelines, and allocate resources efficiently. Failure to implement MBO, as evidenced in the chaotic response to Hurricane Katrina, underscores the principle’s importance in crisis scenarios (PBS, 2022).


Flexibility and Adaptability: Responding to Uncertainty

Emergencies and dynamic environments demand flexibility in applying management principles. Leaders must adapt to evolving circumstances while maintaining the structural integrity of Span of Control, Unity of Command, and MBO.

For example, during a structure fire, a firefighter initially assigned to ventilation may need to shift roles to search and rescue as the incident evolves. Effective training and a clear understanding of leadership intent enable such adaptability without compromising the overall mission.

In non-emergency settings, flexibility is equally vital. A corporate team might pivot their marketing strategy based on real-time analytics, demonstrating the ability to adjust goals while adhering to overarching objectives.


Conclusion
The principles of Span of Control, Unity of Command, and Management by Objectives form the foundation of effective management in emergency and non-emergency settings. When applied correctly, these principles enhance communication, streamline decision-making, and improve outcomes. Conversely, neglecting them can result in inefficiencies, miscommunication, and, in emergencies, potentially life-threatening delays. By understanding and implementing these principles, organizations can achieve greater efficiency and resilience in managing both routine and high-stakes situations.


References

  • American Heart Association. (2022). Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) Provider Manual.
  • Drucker, P. (1954). The Practice of Management. Harper & Row.
  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (2023). Incident Command System Overview.
  • Hodge, B., Anthony, W. P., & Gales, L. M. (2020). Organization Theory: A Strategic Approach. Pearson.
  • PBS. (2022). The Storm: Hurricane Katrina Documentary.

Hashtags

#EmergencyManagement #LeadershipPrinciples #CrisisResponse #ManagementStrategies #ICS

Saturday, July 13, 2024

Internships in Emergency Management

 

How Internships Benefit University Students in Emergency Management, Business Continuity, and Humanitarian Services

Internships play a vital role in preparing students for careers in emergency management, business continuity, disaster response, and humanitarian work. Here’s how internships contribute to student development in these fields:

Practical Experience

Internship
Internships provide hands-on experience, allowing students to apply classroom knowledge to real-world situations. Working directly with professionals enhances practical skills and problem-solving abilities. For instance, emergency management interns might participate in disaster response drills, helping them understand the logistics and coordination required during actual emergencies. This experience is crucial for building confidence and competence in high-pressure scenarios.

Networking

Internships offer opportunities to build professional networks. Students can connect with experts, mentors, and potential employers, forming relationships that can lead to job offers or valuable references. Networking within organizations such as the American Red Cross or FEMA exposes students to a wide range of professionals who can provide career advice and opportunities for future collaborations.

Industry Insights

Interns gain insights into the industry’s dynamics, challenges, and best practices. They learn about emergency protocols, risk assessment, disaster response strategies, and the importance of preparedness. This exposure helps students understand the complexities of their chosen field and prepares them for the demands of their future careers.

Adaptability

Working in diverse environments during internships helps students adapt to different contexts, a crucial skill in emergency management and humanitarian settings. Interns may find themselves working in various locations, from urban centers to rural areas affected by disasters, teaching them to be flexible and resourceful.

Crisis Management Skills

Interns learn to handle high-pressure situations, make quick decisions, and communicate effectively during emergencies. These skills are transferable across various fields, making students valuable assets in any professional setting. For example, an intern in business continuity might be tasked with developing and testing a company’s disaster recovery plan, learning to manage crises efficiently.

Understanding Vulnerable Populations

Internships in humanitarian organizations expose students to vulnerable populations. They learn about cultural sensitivity, gender considerations, and community engagement. Understanding these aspects is essential for providing effective aid and support during disasters and crises.

Enhanced Resume

Having an internship on a resume adds credibility and demonstrates a commitment to the field. It shows potential employers that the student has practical experience and is dedicated to making a positive impact. Internships with renowned organizations like the American Red Cross or the United Nations can significantly boost a student’s employability.

Specific Skills Gained Through Internships in Emergency Management

Internships in emergency management provide valuable skills and experiences, including:

  • Practical Application: Interns gain hands-on experience, applying classroom knowledge to real-world situations. They learn incident management, response protocols, and crisis communication.

  • Networking: Interns connect with professionals, building a network within the field. These connections can lead to job opportunities and references.

  • Crisis Decision-Making: Interns learn to make quick decisions under pressure, a crucial skill for emergency scenarios.

  • Safety and Health Standards: Understanding safety regulations, accident investigation techniques, and health standards is essential.

  • Administrative and Organizational Skills: Interns develop organizational abilities, adaptability, and proficiency in software applications like Microsoft Office.

Finding Relevant Internship Opportunities

Finding internships in emergency management, business continuity, or humanitarian services involves several steps:

  • Research Organizations: Explore websites of organizations relevant to your field. Look for internship programs offered by agencies like the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC), and other humanitarian organizations.

  • University Career Services: Utilize your university’s career services office. They often have internship listings and can guide you through the application process.

  • Job Boards and Websites: Check platforms like Indeed, Glassdoor, and LinkedIn for internship postings in your desired field. Explore specialized websites like Humanitarian Careers and Aidboard for humanitarian internship opportunities.

  • Networking: Connect with professionals in your field through networking events, conferences, and online platforms. Attend webinars, workshops, and seminars related to emergency management and humanitarian work.

  • Apply Early: Many internships have specific application deadlines. Apply well in advance to secure your spot.

Successful Examples of Student-Led Disaster Response Initiatives During Internships

Internships often lead to innovative and impactful initiatives by students:

  • FEMA National Internship Program: Participants collaborate to create a framework for a national internship program, leveraging emergency management students as a support to disaster workforce needs. This relationship between academia and FEMA adds value to both sides.

  • American Heart Association Internship Program: Provides college students with hands-on experience in disaster response, working with a non-profit, voluntary health organization.

  • St. Olaf College Student’s Initiative: A student organized critical data for the American Red Cross, enabling virtual engagement in disaster relief.

Conclusion

Internships bridge the gap between theory and practice, fostering professional growth and preparing students for impactful careers in emergency management, business continuity, and humanitarian services. They provide practical experience, industry insights, and valuable networking opportunities. By actively participating in internships, students can significantly enhance their career prospects and make meaningful contributions to society.

For more information on how to get involved, visit the websites of relevant organizations or contact your university’s career services office.

Tuesday, August 02, 2016

Managing Life-and-Death Situations

With an emergency management plan in place, Iowa Gov. Tom Vilsack was prepared when tornadoes hit in 1999. (AP)
When former Iowa Gov. Tom Vilsack was about to take office in 1999, he went to the National Governors Association’s New Governor’s School, and sat next to then-Gov. Zell Miller of Georgia. Vilsack had one big question to ask his seatmate: “What are the one or two things I should focus on? Should it be health care? Jobs? Education?”

As Vilsack recalls, “Gov. Miller said, ‘Son, emergency management. I guarantee you that within six months something is going to happen in your state and if you don’t handle it well, it won’t make any damn difference what you do in health care or jobs or education.”  Read the rest of the article. 

Saturday, November 14, 2015

The Role of First Responders

Responder Role in Disasters and other Emergencies
By John Fisher



Who are first responders?

The first people on the scene in an emergency or natural disaster are usually police officers, firefighters, and paramedics, or emergency medical technicians (EMT). As first responders, they are trained to react quickly in emergencies. Their first responsibility is to make sure people are safe, which may include evacuation, rescue, crowd control, and medical attention. Suppressing fires and controlling other hazards is usually left to firefighters while police officers secure the area by redirecting traffic and keeping bystanders away. In these roles, they serve as “a calming force, keeping panic and disorder to a minimum” (US Legal, 2010). Paramedics and EMTs are most often associated with fire departments, many of which require their people to have both fire and medical training. SWAT teams may also contain trained paramedics.

Natural disasters spare no one. Matthew Tobia (2013) points out the ferocity of storms like Hurricane Andrew or Katrina, and, more recently, Superstorm Sandy.  “The same forces that move homes off their foundations or burn them to ashes don’t just make left turns around fire stations, sparing them from destruction.” Instead, firefighters and police, paramedics and EMTs learn to deal with disasters with the tools at hand. This requires they prepare for the worst scenarios and hope for the best. In addition, to preparing themselves it also is vital they prepare the communities in which they live, including their own families.

Because first responders usually live in the communities they serve, they know their communities well. They know the streets and buildings, and they understand the people and the local government. This gives them the advantage, like in Joplin where not a street sign was standing after the 2011 tornado, of being able to respond knowingly and effectively.  When a community is leveled they may have little to work with, but they use their resourcefulness to meet the needs of their community. Often this will require the joint effort of other agencies and community members.   

One specialized role is that of the fire marshal. A fire marshal, in the United States and Canada, is often a member of a fire department but may be part of a building department or a separate department altogether. Fire marshals' duties vary but usually include fire code enforcement and/or investigating fires for origin and cause. Fire marshals may be sworn law-enforcement officers and are often experienced firefighters. Fire marshals may carry a weapon, wear a badge, wear a uniform or plain clothes, and make arrests pertaining to arson and related offenses, or, in other localities, may have duties entirely separate from law enforcement, including building- and fire-code-related inspections. In many areas, the fire marshal is responsible for enforcing laws concerning flammable materials.

What is the role of the National Guard and Coast Guard in disaster situations?

The Army National Guard, the Air National Guard, and the U.S. Coast Guard provide vital support during natural disasters. The Army National Guard and Air National Guard have over 300 thousand members in more than 1,800 National Guard units located in 2,700 communities across the United States. While the National Guard receives military training for wartime service, they also are trained in emergency response skills and answer the call when their service is needed to deal with disasters. The Coast Guard is made up of active duty, reserve, and civilian personnel and protects the coastal boundaries of the United States. They performed a vital role in the BP spill cleanup in 2010 and respond in all disasters along our coastal shores.

While the National Guard is under the jurisdiction of the federal government when called up for war, they usually serve under state governments and can be called up by the state governor in response to disasters. State National Guards work cooperatively with local authorities during emergencies and natural disasters. National Guard troops help reinforce dams and dikes threatened by floods, work to contain forest fires, and assist community rebuilding efforts after hurricanes and tornadoes. Because Guard members have unique skills like flying helicopters and airplanes and driving trucks, they serve a vital role in transporting supplies, injured and sick people, and emergency materials (US Legal, 2010).

What is the role of hospitals in a disaster?

The role of hospitals in the community response to disasters has received increased attention, particularly since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Hospitals must be prepared to respond to and recover from all-hazards emergencies and disasters. The continued progress of our medical response system in all-hazard emergencies and disasters depends in large part on the future guidance and support from government institutions (Sauer, 2009).

In many communities, hospitals have not been integrated well into the community disaster response system and thus may not be prepared to safely treat mass casualties from disasters and incidents involving hazardous materials.  Of particular concern is keeping health care workers safe. Healthcare workers may be exposed to chemical, biological, physical or radioactive hazards while providing care to patients who arrive at the hospital for triage following an incident involving hazardous materials. Safeguarding health care workers who deal with emergencies is critical in performing the mission to save lives and protect the public. The few cases of Ebola to come to the United States in 2014 from Africa showed how unprepared hospitals were to deal with a pandemic.  Knowledge about the means to protect health care workers and understanding of emergency response planning essentials will help keep healthcare workers safe from hazardous materials and provide for the treatment of casualties of disasters (OSHA, 1997).

Unlike other institutions, hospitals need to be on 24/7 standby and have essential resources to respond to disasters (Rodak, 2012, OSHA, 1997). These resources should include:
  • Comprehensive community disaster plans for a wide range of potential events, each with diverse action requirements;
  • Training and drills including practice of the Incident Command System (ICS);
  • Back-up generators;
  • Effective communications systems including a line between the incident and hospital;
  • Personal protective equipment that staff can use to avoid exposure and limit contact with infected patients;
  • Decontamination units, which include trained physicians, nurses, aides, and support staff;
  • Decontamination procedures and designated decontamination areas with necessary equipment;
  • Stockpiled medical supplies and pharmaceuticals;
  • Disease surveillance systems including air monitoring and controls to prevent the movement of airborne substances through ventilation and duct work;
  • Access to information on diseases and hazardous toxic materials;
  • Surge capacity to treat an influx of patients and plans for treating non-disaster patients;
  • Alternative facilities in case of contamination of the hospital’s emergency department; and
  • Post-emergency critique of the hospital's emergency response.
What training and education do first responders have?

Following 911 critics called for better training of first responders to deal with emergencies of the size of the impact of a terrorist attack.  Critics noted that first responders were completely unprepared for biological and chemical weapons of mass destruction (Heritage, 2002).

Nine days after the September 11th attacks, to Congress President George W. Bush announced that he would create the Office of Homeland Security to coordinate the efforts of more than 40 federal agencies in order to prevent future terrorist attacks. The Office was created nearly a month after the attacks with Tom Ridge, the former governor of Pennsylvania, as the first the first director. On January 24, 2003, Ridge became the first Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
While at first Homeland Security served primarily as a coordinating body, it later emerged as the principal civilian protector of the country inside and outside its borders. Its stated goal is to prepare for, prevent, and respond to domestic emergencies, including terrorism, human-caused disasters, and natural hazards. One role is to train first responders and prepare the public for emergencies.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is an agency in the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). It trains in the areas of firefighting and emergency management, through the National Fire Academy and the Emergency Management Institute. The Federal Law Enforcement Training Center coordinates training for police officers. In preparing for a disaster, police officers and firefighters trust in their training and capitalize on their knowledge of a community. Exercises simulating disaster situations (large- and small-scale events) help better prepare officers and firefighters and allow them to fully understand the resources and response needed for each event. First responders know their communities best and interact with residents on a daily basis. This knowledge gives them the ability to provide valuable situational awareness to response and recovery groups coming in to help (Hylton, 2013).

What is NIMS?

The National Incident Management System (NIMS), established in March 2004 and revised in 2008, is “a systematic, proactive approach to guide departments and agencies at all levels of government, nongovernmental organizations, and the private sector to work together seamlessly and manage incidents involving all threats and hazards—regardless of cause, size, location, or complexity—in order to reduce loss of life, property and harm to the environment” (FEMA, 2015).

The purpose of NIMS is to provide a common approach for managing incidents. It promotes a flexible but standardized set of incident management practices with emphasis on common principles, a consistent approach to operational structures and supporting mechanisms, and an integrated approach to resource management. NIMS is the foundation of the National Preparedness System (NPS), providing for a unified approach in building and delivering the core capabilities across all five mission areas (Prevention, Protection, Mitigation, Response, and Recovery). 

Incidents typically begin and end locally, and they are managed daily at the lowest possible geographical, organizational, and jurisdictional level. As incidents become larger success may depend on the participation of many jurisdictions, levels of government, non-governmental agencies, and all responders. These instances necessitate effective and efficient coordination across this broad spectrum of organizations and activities. By using NIMS, communities are part of a comprehensive national approach that improves the effectiveness of emergency management and response personnel across the full spectrum of potential threats and hazards (including natural hazards, terrorist activities, and other human-caused disasters) regardless of size or complexity. NIMS is a “whole community” approach, involving community members, first responder agencies, public and private sectors, and non-governmental and non-profit organizations (FEMA, 2015).

The National Incident Management System (NIMS) Training Program defines the national NIMS training program as it relates to the NIMS components of preparedness, communications and information management, resource management, and command and management. It specifies the National Integration Center (NIC) and stakeholder responsibilities and activities for developing, maintaining, and sustaining NIMS training. The NIMS Training Program outlines responsibilities and activities that are consistent with the National Training Program, as mandated by the Post-Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act of 2006. This program integrates with FEMA training offered through the Emergency Management Institute (EMI) and United States Fire Administration (USFA). The National Exercise Program (NEP) is the Nation’s overarching exercise program. All interagency partners have adopted the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) as the methodology for all exercises that will be conducted as part of the NEP (DHS, FCD 1, Nov. 2007, p. 7).

NIMS also provides for effective resource management and mutual aid across jurisdictions and levels of government. As a condition of receive Federal Preparedness grants and awards, local, state, territorial, and tribal nation jurisdictions must implement NIMS procedures and report using NIMS guidelines. NIMS Alerts announce the release of new NIMS guidance, tools, and other resources. FEMA Regional NIMS Coordinators act as subject matter experts regarding NIMS for the local, state, territorial, and tribal nation governments within the 10 FEMA Regions, as well as for the FEMA Regional Administrator and staff. The Incident Command System (ICS) has been established to provide standardization through consistent terminology and established organizational structures (FEMA, 2015).

What is interoperability communications and why is it so important?

During the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, soon after the south building collapsed warnings were sent out to police radios to vacate the north building. Most police were able to vacate the building but over 121 firefighters were left in the North Tower to die. In total 411 first responders died that day: 343 firefighters from the New York City Fire Department, 37 police officers of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Police Department (PAPD); 23 police officers of the New York City Police Department (NYPD); and 8 emergency medical technicians and paramedics from private emergency medical services.

Most firefighters did not get the police warning. The firefighter radio system failed frequently during the morning.  Even if it had been reliable, it wasn’t linked to the police system. In addition, police and fire commanders didn’t communicate with each other during the event  (Dwyer, 2002).

Interoperability communications is "the ability to exchange and make use of information" between agencies like the police and fire departments. It also applies to communications within organizations. Timmons (2007) indicates that radio communications is not the only interoperability failure. Since 9/11 first responder agencies have made headway by purchasing equipment that works among agencies. In addition, the equipment and systems are able to provide signals in remote locations or impenetrable building structures. However, other communication problems result from dysfunctional relationships among agencies, first responder stress in difficult situations, insufficient training and poor procedures and policies.

Interoperability communications can be enhanced by improving, not only equipment and systems, but also human behaviors and relationships. Areas of focus for training, according to Timmons (2007), are sensory overload, cognitive bias, speech center deficit, and suppressed emotions. Sensory overload occurs as soon as first responders arrive at the scene, where they are required to make critical decisions and give commands to others. Cognitive bias occurs when people disregard information that disconfirms their preconceptions. This can lead to an incomplete operational picture. Stress can alter voice pitch and inflection when talking on the radio.  This is speech center deficit. Finally, first responders learn to be calm in an emergency situation. This is not always good because suppressing natural emotional responses can lead to elevated blood pressure and increased stress levels, disrupting communications, and inhibiting relationships.

What is the difference between an emergency and a disaster?

A disaster is “an occurrence disrupting the normal conditions of existence and causing a level of suffering that exceeds the capacity of adjustment of the affected community…. A disaster occurs when hazards and vulnerability meet” (WHO, 2002). A disaster is a sudden calamitous event bringing great damage, loss, or destruction.

The difference between disaster and emergency is fairly big, although an emergency situation can certainly feel like a disaster to those involved. A disaster will likely affect more people and/or will have more devastating consequences than that of an emergency. A disaster is an emergency situation if noticed ahead of time. However, not all emergencies will reach the level of disasters.
An emergency is defined as an unforeseen combination of circumstances or the resulting state that calls for immediate action; an urgent need for assistance or relief.

Ken Jorgustin (2012) wrote: “When I think of disaster and emergency, I consider a disaster to be widespread, regional, or wider. Examples of a disaster may be the consequences of severe weather such as a hurricane, tornado, or flooding. An economic meltdown followed by a rapid devaluation of currency would be considered a disaster, affecting countless millions of people. An emergency is a situation that requires immediate attention, a situation that could lead to disaster if left alone or unattended. Or, maybe it won’t, although it may seem like it to you nonetheless.”

Any disaster that arises from the physical phenomena—hurricanes, floods, earthquakes, tornadoes, tsunamis—can be deemed a natural disaster. Human-caused disasters may also be the direct result of natural conditions. For example, the floods that devastated New Orleans during Hurricane Katrina in August 2005 were caused by levees that burst, but it was the hurricane’s wind and rain that caused the excess of water. Likewise, fires which may destroy wildlands and communities may be human-caused or could result because of dry conditions and electrical storms. The San Francisco fires in April 1906 were caused by broken gas lines resulting from a major earthquake.

While natural disasters can strike anywhere, the poor usually suffer more than the rich, because they lack the resources to rebuild or to relocate. Infrastructure is usually better in wealthier communities and countries. The poor in New Orleans were hardest hit because they built on the low ground and didn’t have the means to evacuate.  On January 12, 2010, a 7.3 magnitude earthquake struck Haiti, killing more than 220,000 people and injuring over 300,000. The massive earthquake, the biggest the region had seen in 200 years, left more than 1.5 million people homeless, and resulted in an immense humanitarian crisis.  The devastation was compounded by poor building practices and weak infrastructure.

In the United States, government agencies can assist those who have lost their homes and possessions. Numerous federal and state government agencies (including non-governmental agencies) provide help to those in need when disaster strikes, but often that assistance covers only part of what is needed. Also, it is difficult to get protection such as homeowner’s insurance in areas prone to damage from floods or hurricanes (US Legal, 2010).



Terrorism is a human-caused threat that is unpredictable and can cause great loss of life and property. The recent terrorist attacks in Paris, France on November 13, 2015, where more than 100 people died, served as a tragic reminder of September 11, 2001, the worst terrorist attack in history. On September 11, 2001, a succession of four coordinated assaults was launched by the al-Queda in the New York City and Washington DC areas. Four planes were hijacked by 19 men and two of those planes, American Airlines Flight 11 and United Airlines Flight 175, collided into the north and south towers of the NYC World Trade Center, which collapsed within two hours and led to the destruction of nearby buildings as well. The third plane, American Flight 77, targeted the Pentagon in Virginia while the last one, United Airlines Flight 93 whose aim was the Capitol in DC, crashed into a field in Pennsylvania when the passengers tried to overpower the hijackers. These catastrophic events led to the deaths of about 3,000 people.

Terrorism is the systematic use or threatened use of violence to intimidate a population or government and thereby effect political, religious, or ideological change.  Terrorist organizations in the United States today use techniques such as hijacking, bombing, diplomatic kidnapping and assassination to assert their demands (US Legal, 2010).

What do first responders do in a disaster?

Emergencies happen very frequently whereas disasters may occur only once or twice in the life of a first responder. Handling emergencies (like car accidents, house fires, and response to crime) helps prepare first responders to deal with disasters.  The role of first responders in responding to a disaster is very similar to the day-to-day role of public safety and supporting the community. Because first responders know their communities and interact with residents on a daily basis they can respond quickly to a heightened crisis situation such as in a disaster. For example, understanding unique community features, like demographic and language characteristics, allows law enforcement officers to help outside emergency management teams in a disaster. Their presence and support in the community in a disaster has a calming effect that helps people respond more appropriately.

During a disaster, police officers play a key role in many operations, including search and rescue, evacuations, door-to-door checks, and maintaining overall public safety within the community. In addition to being involved in some of these same functions, firefighters and paramedics are involved in suppressing fires, handling hazardous materials, and first response medical care and transportation to hospitals. These are critical actions that support not only their own communities but neighboring towns as well (Hylton, 2013).

In the following excerpt, Roberto Hylton (2013) describes first responders working with college students following a tornado. “An EF-3 tornado impacted the nearby college campus and devastated neighborhoods and infrastructure. Emergency services were stretched to the max. Officers worked relentless hours, 48 hours straight in some cases, setting up and supporting emergency response and rescue operations. The scene was chaotic with debris and terrified college students, but the right training helped officers maintain public safety and conduct lifesaving missions.”

How are first responders organized in a disaster? What is the Incident Command System (ICS)?

The National Incident Management System (NIMS) has adopted the Incident Command System (ICS) and mandated its use by first responders in emergencies and disasters. The Incident Command System is a standardized management tool for meeting the demands of small or large emergency or nonemergency situations. It represents "best practices" and has become the standard for emergency management across the country. ICS may be used for planned events, natural disasters, and acts of terrorism.

In the 1960s and 1970s, first responder agencies noted that high cost of wildfires in Arizona and California. Property damage ran into the millions, and many people died or were injured. Studies indicated that response problems were often related to communication and management deficiencies rather than lack of resources or failure of tactics. In a meeting in 1968 Fire Chiefs in Phoenix, Arizona formulated the ICS concept, based on the management hierarchy of the US Navy.  During the 1970s, ICS was fully developed during massive wildfire suppression efforts in California and following a series of catastrophic wildfires in California's urban interface. ICS was developed mainly for firefighting of wildfires in California and Arizona but was quickly adopted nationwide.

The ICS is a management system designed to enable effective and efficient domestic incident management by integrating a combination of facilities, equipment, personnel, procedures, and communications operating within a common organizational structure, designed to enable effective and efficient domestic incident management. A basic premise of ICS is that it is widely applicable. It is used to organize both near-term and long-term field-level operations for a broad spectrum of emergencies, from small to complex incidents, both natural and manmade. ICS is used by all levels of government—Federal, State, local, and tribal—as well as by many private-sector and nongovernmental organizations. ICS is also applicable across disciplines. It is normally structured to facilitate activities in five major functional areas: command, operations, planning, logistics, and finance and administration (FEMA, 2008).

The following chart shows the Incident Command System (ICS) structure:



Source: FEMA. 2008, May). ICS Review Materials.

The Incident Commander is technically not a part of either the General or Command Staff. According to FEMA (2008), the Incident Commander is responsible for overall incident management, including:
  • Ensuring clear authority and knowledge of agency policy.
  • Ensuring incident safety.
  • Establishing an Incident Command Post.
  • Obtaining a briefing from the prior Incident Commander and/or assessing the situation.
  • Establishing immediate priorities.
  • Determining incident objectives and strategy(ies) to be followed.
  • Establishing the level of organization needed, and continuously monitoring the operation and effectiveness of that organization.
  • Managing planning meetings as required.
  • Approving and implementing the Incident Action Plan.
  • Coordinating the activities of the Command and General Staff.
  • Approving requests for additional resources or for the release of resources.
  • Approving the use of participants, volunteers, and auxiliary personnel.
  • Authorizing the release of information to the news media.
  • Ordering demobilization of the incident when appropriate.
  • Ensuring incident after-action reports are completed.
Command Staff
The Command Staff is assigned to carry out staff functions needed to support the Incident Commander. These functions include interagency liaison, incident safety, and public information.
Command Staff positions are established to assign responsibility for key activities not specifically identified in the General Staff functional elements. These positions may include the Public Information Officer, Safety Officer, and Liaison Officer, in addition to various others, as required and assigned by the Incident Commander.

General Staff
The General Staff represents and is responsible for the functional aspects of the incident command structure. The General Staff typically consists of the Operations, Planning, Logistics, and Finance/Administration Sections.
General guidelines related to General Staff positions (FEMA, 2008) include the following:
  • Only one person will be designated to lead each General Staff position.
  • General Staff positions may be filled by qualified persons from any agency or jurisdiction.
  • Members of the General Staff report directly to the Incident Commander. If a General Staff position is not activated, the Incident Commander will have responsibility for that functional activity.
  • Deputy positions may be established for each of the General Staff positions. Deputies are individuals fully qualified to fill the primary position. Deputies can be designated from other jurisdictions or agencies, as appropriate. This is a good way to bring about greater interagency coordination.
  • General Staff members may exchange information with any person within the organization. Direction takes place through the chain of command. This is an important concept in ICS.
  • General Staff positions should not be combined. For example, to establish a "Planning and Logistics Section,” it is better to initially create the two separate functions, and if necessary for a short time place one person in charge of both. That way, the transfer of responsibility can be made easier.
What role do first responders play in preparing and helping the public for emergencies and disasters?

Responding to disasters is a shared responsibility, and those in law enforcement are aware that emergency management planning is for all hazards and that it takes a team effort to keep our communities safe (Hylton, 2013).

The law enforcement community has two vital roles in responding to disasters: As first responders during times of crisis, and providing for the safety and security of the community (Hylton, 2013).  Firefighters, emergency medical personnel, and hospitals have a similar role.

A key role of response agencies in disasters is to ensure the continuity of services.  Tobia (2013) describes the problems first responders faced in a disaster:  “You’re the station captain: look around your office. If everything was gone in an instant—training records, computers, phones, payroll systems, LOSAP records, personnel files—how would you reconstitute your station? Walk out to the apparatus bay and imagine all of the apparatus destroyed. Again, how would you provide essential services? If the members of your company failed to post for duty because their homes and families were severely affected by an event, who would respond to the calls for help?”

Tobia (2013) makes the following recommendations, which I’ve adapted to apply to all emergency services:

  • Leaders in the emergency services must be closely tied to their communities. They should never misinform the public about their capacity to respond during extreme weather and other natural disasters.
  • Emergency service leaders must lead by example by being prepared and having a plan to keep their own family members safe. This includes planning and practicing a home escape plan, which also designates a meeting location away from a disaster in the event families become separated. Families also need to have copies of all essential documents, and cash, secured in a location away from their homes. Tobia (2013) says first responders “should not jeopardize our public by being unprepared ourselves.”
  • Emergency service leaders must develop and maintain Continuity of Operations Plans (COOPs) that deal with how to reconstitute their organizations after a disaster. This means identifying and securing critical hardware, software and supporting documentation before an event occurs. “COOPs provide a roadmap to recovery while maintaining the ability to respond to calls for service,” says Tobia (2013).
  • Should a massive storm approach, emergency service leaders may have to evacuate their apparatus, hardware, software, equipment and your people, so that when the storm is over they can come back and assist the community to respond and recover. 
Tobia (2013) says: “Since Katrina, FEMA has dramatically altered its language when speaking to the public. In 2008, when Gustav was approaching Galveston, Texas, the message was loud and clear: “If you choose not to evacuate, you will face certain death.” That is the first time I can recall hearing such blunt and honest language from a federal agency whose mission is to save lives. And that is exactly what they were doing—by educating the public so that they could make the right decisions about their safety. As firefighters, we have a similar obligation to not only echo those words but heed them.”

References:

Dwyer, Jim, Kevin Flynn and Ford Fessenden. (2002, July 7). FATAL CONFUSION: A Troubled Emergency Response; 9/11 Exposed Deadly Flaws In Rescue Plan. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/07/nyregion/fatal-confusion-troubled-emergency-response-9-11-exposed-deadly-flaws-rescue.html?pagewanted=all
FEMA. (2015, October 3). The National Incident Management System (NIMS). Retrieved from https://www.fema.gov/national-incident-management-system
FEMA. (2008, May). ICS Review Material. Retrieved from https://training.fema.gov/emiweb/is/icsresource/assets/reviewmaterials.pdf
Heritage Foundation. (2002, May 14). Feds Must Train "First Responders" in More Organized Manner, Analysts Say. Retrieved from http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2002/05/feds-must-train-first-responders-in-more-organized-manner-analysts-say
Hylton, Roberto. (2013, August 12). Law Enforcement’s Role in Responding to Disasters. Retrieved from http://www.fema.gov/blog/2013-08-12/law-enforcements-role-responding-disasters
Jorgustin, Ken. (2012, February 20). Disaster and Emergency, What’s The Difference? Modern Survival Blog. Retrieved from http://modernsurvivalblog.com/modern-survival-ideology/disaster-and-emergency-whats-the-difference/
List25. (2014, February 17). 25 Worst Acts of Terrorism Ever Committed. Retrieved from http://list25.com/25-worst-acts-terrorism-committed/
Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (1997). Hospitals and Community Emergency Response - What You Need to Know (OSHA 3152). U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved from https://www.osha.gov/Publications/OSHA3152/osha3152.html
Rodak, Sabrina. (2012, December 10). 9 Essentials for Hospital Disaster Readiness and Response. Becker's Hospital Review.  Retrieved from http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/capacity-management/9-essentials-for-hospital-disaster-readiness-and-response.html
Sauer LM, McCarthy ML, Knebel A, & Brewster P. (2009). Major influences on hospital emergency management and disaster preparedness. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 3(2): S68-73. doi: 10.1097/DMP.0b013e31819ef060.
Timmons, Ronald. (2007, February). Interoperability: Stop Blaming the Radio. Homeland Security Affairs 3, Article 5. Retrieved from https://www.hsaj.org/articles/153
Tobia, Matthew. (2013, January).  Fire Departments Must Prepare for Natural Disasters: We have an obligation to prepare ourselves, our familiars and our stations. Fire Rescue. Retrieved from http://www.firefighternation.com/article/special-operations/fire-departments-must-prepare-natural-disasters
US Legal. (2010-2014). Homeland Security. Retrieved from http://homelandsecurity.uslegal.com/
WHO/EHA. (2002, March). DEFINITIONS: Training Package. retrieved from http://apps.who.int/disasters/repo/7656.pdf

Cite this article:
Fisher, John. (2015). The Role of First Responders. Community Emergency Preparedness. Retrieved from http://www.communityemergencypreparedness.com/2015/11/the-role-of-first-responders.html

Wednesday, June 24, 2015

New Insight on the Nation’s Earthquake Hazards

To help make the best decisions to protect communities from earthquakes, new USGS maps display how intense ground shaking could be across the nation.

The USGS recently updated their U.S. National Seismic Hazard Maps, which reflect the best and most current understanding of where future earthquakes will occur, how often they will occur, and how hard the ground will likely shake as a result.
42 States at Risk; 16 States at High Risk
While all states have some potential for earthquakes, 42 of the 50 states have a reasonable chance of experiencing damaging ground shaking from an earthquake in 50 years (the typical lifetime of a building). Scientists also conclude that 16 states have a relatively high likelihood of experiencing damaging ground shaking. These states have historically experienced earthquakes with a magnitude 6 or greater.
The hazard is especially high along the west coast, intermountain west, and in several active regions of the central and eastern U.S., such as near New Madrid, MO, and near Charleston, SC. The 16 states at highest risk are Alaska, Arkansas, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Kentucky, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming.
While these overarching conclusions of the national-level hazard are similar to those of the previous maps released in 2008, details and estimates differ for many cities and states. Several areas have been identified as being capable of having the potential for larger and more powerful earthquakes than previously thought due to more data and updated earthquake models. The most prominent changes are discussed below.
Informed Decisions Based on the Maps
With an understanding of potential ground shaking levels, various risk analyses can be calculated by considering factors like population levels, building exposure, and building construction practices. This is used for establishing building codes, and in the analysis of seismic risk for key structures. This can also help in determining insurance rates, emergency preparedness plans, and private property decisions such as re-evaluating one’s home and making it more resilient.
These maps are part of USGS contributions to the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP), which is a congressionally-established partnership of four federal agencies with the purpose of reducing risks to life and property in the U.S. that result from earthquakes. The contributing agencies are the USGS, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), National Institute of Standards and Technology, and National Science Foundation (NSF). As an example of the collaboration, the hazards identified in the USGS maps underlie FEMA-sponsored seismic design provisions that are incorporated into building codes adopted by states and localities. The maps also reflect investments in research by academic and other scientists supported by grants from the USGS and the NSF.
“The standards for seismic safety in building codes are directly based upon USGS assessments of potential ground shaking from earthquakes, and have been for years,” said Jim Harris, a member and former chair of the Provisions Update Committee of the Building Seismic Safety Council. “The committees preparing those standards welcome this updated USGS information as a basis for making decisions and continuing to ensure the most stable and secure construction.”
Key Updates
East Coast
The eastern U.S. has the potential for larger and more damaging earthquakes than considered in previous maps and assessments. As one example, scientists learned a lot following the magnitude 5.8 earthquake that struck Virginia in 2011. It was among the largest earthquakes to occur along the east coast in the last century, and helped determine that even larger events are possible. Estimates of earthquake hazards near Charleston, SC, have also gone up due to the assessment of earthquakes in the state.
In New York City, the maps indicate a slightly lower hazard for tall buildings than previously thought (but still a hazard nonetheless). Scientists estimated a lower likelihood for slow shaking from an earthquake near the city. Slow shaking is likely to cause more damage to tall structures in contrast, compared to fast shaking which is more likely to impact shorter structures.
Central U.S.
The New Madrid Seismic Zone has been identified to have a larger range of potential earthquake magnitudes and locations than previously identified. This is a result of a range of new research, part of which was recently compiled by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
West Coast
In California, earthquake hazard extends over a wider area than previously thought. Most notably, faults were recently discovered, raising earthquake hazard estimates for San Jose, Vallejo and San Diego. On the other hand, new insights on faults and rupture processes reduced earthquake hazard estimates for Irvine, Santa Barbara and Oakland. Hazard increased in some parts of the San Francisco Bay Area and Los Angeles region and decreased in other parts. These updates were from the new Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast Model, which incorporates many more potential fault ruptures than did previous assessments. Recent earthquakes in Alaska, Mexico and New Zealand taught scientists more about complex ruptures and how faults can link together. This insight was applied to California for which approximately 250,000 potential complex ruptures were modeled.
New research on the Cascadia Subduction Zone resulted in increased estimates of earthquake magnitude up to magnitude 9.3. Deep-sea cores were collected that show evidence within the sea-floor sediments of large earthquake-generated mudflows. Earthquake shaking estimates were also increased following abundant data gathered from the magnitude 9.0 earthquake in Tohoku, Japan in 2011 and the magnitude 8.2 earthquake offshore of Chile in 2014, as those events ruptured along subduction zones similar to the Pacific Northwest zone. 
In Washington, scientists incorporated new knowledge of the Tacoma Fault into the maps and identified changes to the geometry of the Whidbey Island fault in the northern Puget Sound. Earthquake hazard also increased for Las Vegas because of new science. In Utah, scientists dug trenches to study prehistoric earthquakes along the Wasatch Fault. While the overall seismic hazard didn’t change significantly, detailed changes were made to the fault models in this region and robust data were acquired to hone the assessments. This is valuable since approximately 75% of Utah’s population, including the residents of Salt Lake City, lives near this fault.
The magnitude 7.9 earthquake in Wenchuan, China in 2008 provided many new records of shaking that are very similar to anticipated future earthquakes in the western U.S., as the fault structures are similar. Previously, scientists did not have nearly as many shaking records from earthquakes of this size.
Induced Earthquakes … Research Underway
Some states have experienced increased seismicity in the past few years that may be associated with human activities such as the disposal of wastewater in deep wells.
One specific focus for the future is including an additional layer to these earthquake hazard maps to account for recent potentially triggered earthquakes that occur near some wastewater disposal wells. Injection-induced earthquakes are challenging to incorporate into hazard models because they may not behave like natural earthquakes and their rates change based on man-made activities.
You Can’t Plan If …
“USGS earthquake science is vital because you can’t plan for earthquakes if you don’t know what you are planning for,” said Mark Petersen, Chief of the USGS National Seismic Hazard Mapping Project. “Our nation’s population and exposure to large earthquakes has grown tremendously in recent years. The cost of inaction in planning for future earthquakes and other natural disasters can be very high, as demonstrated by several recent damaging events across the globe. It is important to understand the threat you face from earthquakes at home and the hazards for the places you might visit. The USGS is dedicated to applying the best available science in developing reliable products useful for reducing the earthquake risk across the U.S.”
Start with USGS Science
The USGS is the only federal agency with responsibility for recording and reporting earthquake activity nationwide and providing a seismic hazard assessment. The USGS regularly updates the national seismic hazard models and maps, typically every 6 years, in sync with the building code updates. The 2014 update focuses on the conterminous U.S. Maps are also available for Alaska (last updated in 2007); Hawaii (1998); Puerto Rico (2003); Guam and Marianna Islands (2012); andAmerican Samoa (2012).
View the maps online at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2014/1091/

Friday, August 22, 2014

Whole Community Approach to Emergency Management

The effects of natural and manmade disasters have become more frequent, far-reaching, and widespread. As a result, preserving the safety, security, and prosperity of all parts of our society is becoming more challenging. Our Nation’s traditional approach to managing the risks associated with these disasters relies heavily on the government. However, today’s changing reality is affecting all levels of government in their efforts to improve our Nation’s resilience while grappling with the limitations of their capabilities. Even in small- and medium-sized disasters, which the government is generally effective at managing, significant access and service gaps still exist. In large-scale disasters or catastrophes, government resources and capabilities can be overwhelmed.

Homes destroyed when a tornado hit Joplin, MO May 22, 2011.
The scale and severity of disasters are growing and will likely pose systemic threats.2 Accelerating changes in demographic trends and technology are making the effects of disasters more complex to manage. One future trend affecting emergency needs is continued population shifts into vulnerable areas (e.g., hurricane-prone coastlines). The economic development that accompanies these shifts also intensifies the pressure on coastal floodplains, barrier islands, and the ecosystems that support food production, the tourism industry, and suburban housing growth. Other demographic changes will affect disaster management activities, such as a growing population of people with disabilities living in communities instead of institutions, as well as people living with chronic conditions (e.g., obesity and asthma). Also, communities are facing a growing senior population due to the Baby Boom generation entering this demographic group. Consequently, changes in transportation systems and even housing styles may follow to accommodate the lifestyles of these residents. If immigration trends continue as predicted, cities and suburbs will be more diverse ethnically and linguistically. Employment trends, when combined with new technologies, will shift the ways in which local residents plan their home-to-work commuting patterns as well as their leisure time. All of these trends will affect the ways in which residents organize and identify with community-based associations and will influence how they prepare for and respond to emergencies.

Read the rest of the white paper.

Questions:
Describe the whole community approach to dealing with disasters? What are some of the factors that nake communities complex? How can emergency service personnel leverage and strength socialinfrastructure, networks, and assets? How does this approach relate to public safety and counter-terrorism?

Saturday, April 27, 2013

The Unthinkable: Who Survives When Disaster Strikes and Why

The Unthinkable: Who Survives When Disaster Strikes and Why
Author: Amanda Ripley
Three Rivers Press
2009

Review by William Taylor

        The book The Unthinkable by Amanda Ripley discusses how people react during a crisis or catastrophe, noting how particular reactions can kill some and yet help others survive. The value of The Unthinkable is tremendous to whoever decides to read it as it addresses the average citizen, narrates real life events, and applies to everyday life in a direct and meaningful way.
On December 6, 1917, in Nova Scotia, a freighter carrying 25 tons of TNT exploded in the harbor after an accidental collision. The freighter caught fire as a result of the collision, but when it also brushed up against a dock in the harbor, it set the whole town of Halifax ablaze, killing 1,963 people. Such an accident had an enormous effect on many of the survivors, including a priest in Halifax. After the disaster, he opened his church to the injured, but eventually decided to leave his parish to pursue a PhD in sociology in New York City. He was the first to analyze how humans react during disasters in a paper entitled “Catastrophe and Social Change.”
        The survival arc, depicted below, describes three phases people go through during any type of disaster situation. Ripley bases the majority of her book on these three phases, as they are important to everyday citizens, her target audience.

Denial
During this initial phase, a person’s brain tries to process what has happened after a disaster. People typically don’t just start running for the doors when something happens; instead, they tend to procrastinate. Ripley gives an example of a lady during the 9/11 attacks who was in the first tower to be hit. While this lady was making sense of what happened with each piece of information she received, she went from, “Poor pilot, he must have had a heart attack,” when the first plane hit to, “It was intentional,” after the second plane crashed.
  There are many interesting things that Ripley discusses about the Denial phase. One of these is the ability people have to become paralyzed. There are physiological reasons for this that stem from a natural instinct our bodies have. An example of this is a young man who did absolutely nothing during the Virginia Tech massacre, and lived because of it. He never left the denial phase, but stayed there the entire time. The young man recounted how he got under a desk and simply played dead. He said that it felt natural to act this way—so natural that when he tried to move hours later, it was very difficult. Such a phenomenon occurs naturally when the brain sends a stress hormone through the body during an emergency to act as a natural painkiller and creates paralysis. In studies of animals, researchers have found that if an animal is left in this state of natural paralysis, they can actually die from cardiac arrest. Rollo May, in his book The Meaning of Anxiety, stated the following about paralysis:
       These instances demonstrate that anxiety involves a paralyzing, to a greater or lesser degree, of the productive activates of the individual on various fronts—his thinking and feeling capacities as well as his capacity to plan and to act. This impoverishing effect of anxiety underlies the common dictum that “anxiety cancels out work. (May 1977, p.383)

Deliberation
The deliberation phase is one that can also get people killed. During the 9/11 attacks, there was a man in the first tower, who, with five other people, deliberated about what to do for over thirty minutes before taking the stairs. Though deliberating can be an essential element during a crisis phase, spending too much time there can be deadly, just as it is in the denial phase. [In the example you gave of the denial phase, though, the man actually survived precisely because he stayed in that phase so long. You might want to include another example of someone who was less fortunate and didn’t survive.] During this phrase, many people relate that they experience time speeding up or slowing down. Part of this has to do with the brain looking at the options and deciding what to do; the brain may seem to slow down time because of the energy being used up in other vital parts of the body, but then it may seem to speed up as the brain does the same thing.
Deliberation doesn’t necessarily happen during a crisis, but often does leading up to one, as in the case of a hurricane. Two days before hurricane Katrina made a landfall on New Orleans, the mayor thought about giving a mandatory evacuation order, but had to consult his lawyers first to make sure that there couldn’t be a lawsuit brought against him. Such deliberation, I am sure, wasted valuable time.
According to Ripley’s book, there aren’t many people who stay in deliberation very long; if they get out of the denial phase, then they are usually on their way to the decisive moment, or action. Many of the people interviewed went from denial to action; some even skipped denial and deliberation and just acted.

Decisive moment
During the decisive moment, a person acts. The one thing that most people have in common who skip almost immediately to this phase is military training, or at least some sort of training. During a plane disaster, the one thing that most survivors have in common is that they had all read the emergency pamphlet in the back of the seat. This allowed their brain to easily recall what to do and kicked them into the action phase almost immediately.
The Pan Am flight, which collided with another airliner in 1977, killing 326 of the 396 people on board, should have had limited casualties on their plane. One couple was saved because the husband skipped the denial phase and went straight into action. His wife explains her reaction: “My mind was almost blank. I didn’t even hear what was going on.” But her husband, Paul Heck, reacted immediately:
         He unbuckled his seat belt and started toward the exit. “Follow me!” he told his wife. Hearing him, Floy [his wife] snapped out of her daze and followed him through the smoke “like a zombie.” Just before they jumped… Floy looked back at her friend, who was just sitting there, looking straight ahead, her mouth slightly open, hands folded in her lap. Like dozens of others, she would die not from the collision but from the fire that came afterward. (Ripley, 2009, p.176)
          What Paul did that day could be described as Recognition-Primed Decision (RPD). As previously mentioned, reviewing the emergency pamphlet in the back of the plane seat can save lives, and the RPD model is why. “In the recognition-primed decision model, proficient decision makers are described as being able to detect patterns and typicality. They can size up a situation in a glance and realize that they have seen it, or variants of it, dozens or hundreds of times before” (Klein 1999, p. 151). While Paul didn’t have experience in actually evacuating a plane, he had the information he needed, which helped him become an expert. Being an “expert” doesn’t have to be an intensive training course or years of experience; it can be as simple as reviewing some information. This isn’t true across the board, but was for Paul and Floyd. Part of the power that Paul did use to help his RPD be effective is mental simulation. “Mental simulation covers the ability to see events that happened previously and events that are likely to happen in the future” (Klein 1999, p.149).
As this book demonstrates, ordinary people can survive disasters. While fire-fighters, officers, and paramedics are great and do wonderful things, they aren’t always going to be there. Amanda Ripley shows the importance of self-preparation in self-preservation. Part of the ability to make decisions like Paul, comes from individual preparation, something as simple as reading a pamphlet. Through such preparation, the brain can imagine what something might be like and prepare to act in advance. In his book Blink, Malcolm Gladwell explains our subconscious:
       Our brain uses two very different strategies to make sense of the situation… The first is the conscious strategy. We think about what we’ve learned, and eventually we come up with an answer. There’s a second strategy though. It operates a lot more quickly. It has the drawback, however, that it operates-at least at first-entirely below the surface of consciousness. It’s a system in which our brain reaches conclusions without immediately telling us that it’s reaching conclusions. (Gladwell 2007, p.10).
        The Unthinkable describes how the process of doing simple things makes a whole lot of difference. This is why our subconscious figures it all out long before we do; however, it can only do so if information is readily available to it.
The Unthinkable by Amanda Ripley provides a wealth of information to help the average person better deal with everyday possible disasters. The stories told of people evacuating the World Trade Center are very applicable to everyday life as most people are in buildings constantly. The question is, does everyone read the emergency plans and imagine what he/she would do and where he/she would go? Amanda Ripley has done an excellent job of helping others become better prepared.

References

Gladwell, M (2007). Blink. New York, New York: Little, Brown and Company.
Klein, G (1999). Sources of Power. United States of America: Massachusetts Institute of
Technology.
May, R (1996). The Meaning of Anxiety. New York, New York: Norton.
Ripley, A (2009). The Unthinkable. Crown, New York: Three Rivers Press.